![]() |
|||||||
| Home | Contacts | Membership | Meetings | Primate Eye | Conservation | Captive Care | Site Index |
European Federation of Primatology Meeting 2000hosted by the Primate Society of Great Britain A scientific meeting will be held in London on the 27th, 28th and 29th November, 2000. On Monday, 27th November there will be a series of workshops, lead by experts in different fields of primatology (to be held at University of Surrey Roehampton and at Goldsmiths College, University of London). These will explore a range of topical and methodological issues in primatology (see details below). Applications are invited, particularly from post-graduate students, although established researchers and undergraduates will also be welcome. The workshops are available as half day units and each participant will have the opportunity to attend two workshops. For further details about these workshops contact Ann MacLarnon (School of Life Sciences, University of Surrey Roehampton, West Hill, London SW15 3SN, U.K. Tel: +44 (0) 20 8392 3524, Fax: +44 (0) 20 8392 3527, E-mail: Life_Sciences@roehampton.ac.uk). There will also be a poster display and wine reception at 6 pm on 27th November at the University of Surrey Roehampton open to all meeting participants. Abstracts (maximum 200 words) should be submitted to Ann MacLarnon at a.maclarnon@roehampton.ac.uk, or School of Life Sciences, University of Surrey Roehampton, West Hill, London SW15 3SN by 31st August 2000. Acceptance of posters will be notified in September. Posters should measure a maximum of 100cm (width) by 140cm (height). During the following two days (28th and 29th November) the invited speakers programme (see below) will be held at the Meeting Rooms of the Zoological Society of London in Regent's Park, London. Further details about this part of the meeting may be obtained from Hilary Box (Department of Psychology, University of Reading, Whitenights, Reading, RG6 2AL, U.K. Tel.: +44 (0)118 9316668, Fax: +44 (0)118 9316715, E-mail: h.box@reading.ac.uk). The local organising committee for the conference is Hilary Box (UK), Ann MacLarnon (UK), Hannah Buchanan-Smith (UK), Bertrand Deputte (France), together with the assistance of both the President of the Primate Society of Great Britain, Phyllis Lee and of the EFP, Régine Vercauteren Drubbel (Belgium). Members of the advisory committee also include Fernando Colmenares (Spain) and Augusto Vitale (Italy). Registration for both the workshops and the conference is required. The deadline is 31st August, 2000. Registration forms, which include details of registration fees, are enclosed in this issue of Primate Eye. Workshop Programme 27th November Goldsmiths College
University of Surrey Roehampton
Invited Speakers' Programme28th November 9.55 Introductory remarks - Hilary Box
10.00 New Light on the Dates of Primate Origins and Divergence. Robert D. Martin (Universität Zürich-Irchel, Switzerland), Christophe Soligo (Universität Zürich-Irchel and The Natural History Museum, UK), Simon Tavaré (University of Southern California, USA), Oliver Will (University of Southern California, USA) and Charles Marshall (Harvard University, USA). 10.30 The Evolution of the Social Brain. Robin Dunbar (University of Liverpool, UK). 11.00 - 11.30 COFFEE 11.30 OSMAN HILL MEMORIAL LECTURE Primate Comparative Anatomy and the Evolution of Reproduction. Alan Dixson (Zoological Society of San Diego, USA). 12.30 - 2.00 LUNCH
2.00 The Primate-Mother Relationship: Causes and Consequences. Christopher Pryce (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich, Switzerland). 2.30 Field Endocrinology: Studying Hormone-Behaviour Interactions of Primates in the Wild. Keith Hodges (Deutsches Primatenzentrum, Göttingen, Germany). 3.00 - 3.30 TEA 3.30 Social and Genetic Structure of Polgynous Lemurs. Peter Kappeler (Deutsches Primatenzentrum, Göttingen, Germany). 4.00 Deconstructing Monogamy: Thailand's Gibbons at Khao Yai. Volker Sommer (University College, UK) and Ulrich Reichard (Max-Plank Institut für Evolutionäre Anthropologie, Leipzig, Germany). 4.30 - 6.00 SOCIAL GATHERING 29th November
10.00 Managing Conflict in Group Living Primates. Filippo Aureli (John Moores University, Liverpool, UK). 10.30 Learning what to Eat: The Role of Social Influences in Capuchins. Elisabetta Visalberghi (CRN, Roma, Italy). 11.00 - 11.30 COFFEE 11.30 Two of a Kind: Alternative Sexual Strategies of Adult Male Orangutans. Jan van Hooff (Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands) and Susie Utami Atmoko (Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia). 12.00 - 12.30 The Colobus of Tai forest: Three ways of Making a Living. Ronald Noë (Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France). 12.30 - 2.00 LUNCH
2.00 Conservation and SIV. Annie Gautier-Hion (CNRS Université de Rennes, France). 2.30 Primates, People and Development: The Conservation Challenges in Gabon. Caroline Tutin (Centre Internationale de Recherches Medicales de Franceville, Gabon, West Africa). 3.00 Molecular Ecology of Primates and the Impact of Non-Invasive Techniques. Mike Bruford (Cardiff University, Wales, UK). 3.30 GENERAL DISCUSSION ABSTRACTS EFP 2000 - designated and financially assisted by the EC as a High-Level
Scientific Conference, and hosted by the Primate Society of Great Britain New Light on the Dates of Primate Origins and DivergenceRobert Martin1, Christophe Soligo1, 2, Simon Tavare3, Oliver Will3 &
Charles Marshall4 Living primates excluding tree-shrews form a monophyletic unit containing 6 natural groups (lemurs, lorises, tarsiers, New World monkeys, Old World monkeys, apes and humans), whose early separation is confirmed by chromosomal and molecular comparisons. Continental drift may have influenced this subdivision if divergence times were relatively early. The earliest known unequivocal fossil primates are of basal Eocene age (about 55 Mya) and the standard view is that primates originated about 65 Mya. A similar conclusion has been reached for most orders of placental mammals, and it is widely accepted that the origin and radiation of most mammalian groups followed the extinction of dinosaurs at the end of the Cretaceous. A parallel explanation has been given for the adaptive radiation of modern birds. This all rests on the common procedure of dating the origin of a group by the first known fossil representative, perhaps adding a few million years. Such direct dating from the fossil record faces 2 problems: (1) If the fossil record is very fragmentary, the first known fossil representative is likely to be considerably more recent than the actual origin. (2) Bias in the fossil record may introduce further error. This has direct implications for the common practice of calibrating molecular trees with a single date for the first known fossil of a group. (Here, it is important to distinguish between the time at which a group diverged and the time at which its diversification began.) A simple calculation by Martin (1993) indicated that only 3% of extinct primate species have so far been documented. Poor sampling is also indicated by a still-accelerating discovery rate for new fossil species. Rough correction for underestimation of the time of origin led to the proposal that ancestral primates existed about 80 Mya. This has now been confirmed by our newly developed statistical approach. By contrast, Gingerich & Uhen (1994) calculated that the probability of primates originating 80 Mya was below 5 in a billion. This calculation is demonstrably spurious. Major gaps in the primate fossil record undoubtedly exist, as is true of the mammalian fossil record generally. In the most dramatic primate example, documentation of Malagasy lemurs is limited to subfossils just a few thousand years old, yet it is known that they must have existed at the very least for 20 MY, as the sister-group (lorisiforms) is documented by fossils of that age. Poor documentation of early placental mammals by the fossil record is strikingly illustrated by 2 cases: (1) bats, (2) anteaters. Several recent results from analyses of molecular data using a range of calibration dates external to primates have confirmed an early date for the origin of primates. Inference of divergence times for bird and mammal orders from nuclear gene divergence, calibrated with the well-documented split between synapsid and diapsid reptiles, set the origin of primates at about 90 Mya (Hedges et al, 1996; Kumar et al, 1998). Demonstration of an African clade of placentals (Springer et al, 1997) provided further support for early divergence between mammal orders. Calibrations of complete mtDNA-sequence trees with dates for the earliest known(Palacocene) cetaceans also set the origin of primates at about 90 Mya (Arnason et al, 1998). The problem of bias in the fossil record must also be addressed. Modern primates are largely confined to tropical and subtropical forests of the southern continents. Yet the earliest known (Eocene) primates occur in the northern continents and show little overlap in distribution. The most plausible explanation is that probabilities of fossil preservation/discovery have been far higher in the north and that the record simply reveals a transitory northward expansion of essentially tropical/subtropical primates when temperatures were markedly higher in the Eocene. The early history of primates in the southern hemisphere remains virtually uncharted. The Evolution of the Social BrainRobin Dunbar Primates are distinguished from other groups of animals by the fact that they have unusually large brains for body size. This increase in brain size can largely be attributed to a disproportionate increase in the size of the neocortex (and in particular the prefrontal neocortex) rather than to an increase in the brain as a whole. This raises two key questions: (1) why did brain size increase in this way among the primates? and (2) what have been the consequences? In this lecture, I will show that the primary factor selecting for increased brain size seems to have been the need to evolve large cohesive social groups, and that this in turn was a reflection of the way primates try to deal with the problem of predation. However, not all primates are the same. At least three (and perhaps four) distinct grades in relative neocortex size can be identified among the primates, with prosimians and apes being at opposite ends of a continuum of grades. This raises a particularly interesting question: why did apes as a group opt for especially large increases in brain size? Finally, I will look briefly at some of the cognitive implications of large neocortices in primates and the way that some especially human cognitive traits such as theory of mind and language fit into the story. The Osman Hill Memorial LecturePrimate Comparative Anatomy and the Evolution of ReproductionAlan Dixson Between the years 19531974 Osman Hill produced eight monographs on the comparative anatomy and taxonomy of non-human primates. His books, which contain numerous descriptions of the reproductive organs of primates, were written before the modern era of research on sperm competition and cryptic female choice. Many of the variations in reproductive morphology described by Hill, which he employed for taxonomic purposes, may now be re-interpreted in terms of their evolutionary significance. This lecture will deal with effects of sexual selection upon the evolution of the genitalia, secondary sexual characters (e.g. sexual skin) and patterns of copulatory behaviour in primates. It is well established that relative testes sizes are largest in primates (and other animals) where females mate with multiple partners, and where sperm competition is greatest. However, other components of the males reproductive tract, including the vasa deferentia, seminal vesicles, prostate, striated penile muscles and the penis itself, have also been moulded by sexual selection. The females reproductive anatomy and physiology may also influence which male is successful in fertilizing ova; it is this aspect of sexual selection which Eberhard defines as cryptic female choice. Much less is known about this potential avenue of sexual selection in primates, or in other vertebrates. However, there is some evidence that sexual skin swellings, present in chimpanzees and some of the Old World monkeys, might represent a case of sexual selection by cryptic choice. This hypothesis will be evaluated as part of the lecture. All these ideas and advances owe much to the original comparative anatomical researches of Osman Hill, and his books continue to provide valuable facts and insights. The Primate Mother-Infant Relationship: Causes and ConsequencesChristopher Pryce Primate mothers invest considerable time and energy in a small number of offspring. The neurobiological regulation of their maternal behaviour is important in terms of offspring survival. Furthermore, if the social environment of offspring influences their neurobiological maturation, then maternal behaviour and its regulation are also important in terms of long-term offspring development. A model of maternal motivation proposed that pre-reproductive learning about infants and peripartum neurobiological changes are both important determinants of primate maternal behaviour. Studies in marmosets and tamarins, rhesus macaque and gorilla provide empirical support for the model. The model proposes that the emotional systems of attraction by and anxiety about specific infant stimuli (visual, auditory) increase maternal motivation whereas aversion and neophobia to specific infant stimuli (olfactory, tactual) decrease maternal motivation. Net maternal motivation is determined by pre-reproductive experience and peripartum neurobiology both acting on these systems. Furthermore, these four emotional systems have been incorporated recently into models aimed at elucidating the genetics of human maternal motivation, thereby demonstrating the biomedical importance of comparative neurobehavioural research. Cultural determinants of maternal behaviour and offspring development such as societal-level goals and rules are both important and unique to the human species and cannot be studied (modelled) in any other species. Animal models can however provide valuable insights into the importance of maternal care for the development of emotional and cognitive functions in human offspring, where these functions are similar in humans and other mammals. It is claimed that the rat, despite its very different life-history strategy, provides a valid model of the effects of impoverished maternal care on long-term neurobehavioural development of offspring, particularly in terms of emotional systems, but the current evidence is equivocal. Studies are now on-going in the common marmoset, to investigate the long-term effects of the infant-caregiver relationship on neurodevelopment and the suitability of this approach for modelling human neuropsychiatric disease. Field Endocrinology:Studying hormone-behaviour interactions of primates in the wildJ.K. Hodges, M.Heistermann and T. Ziegler Field endocrinology has been recently described as a focus in primatology
and behavioural ecology that permits examination of social/reproductive
behaviour and life history through hormonal investigations in natural
settings (1). It is an area currently experiencing considerable growth,
largely due to the extended opportunities for study provided by recent
advances in non-invasive methodologies. In this way, use of faecal hormone
analysis to generate hormone profiles from free-ranging animals, provides
new opportunities for exploring proximate mechanisms underlying behavioural
variation and for testing hypotheses concerning the functional and evolutionary
significance of primate mating strategies. (1) Whitten et al (1998) Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 41 1-23. Social and Genetic Structure of Polygynous LemursPeter M. Kappeler Because lemurs have been isolated on Madagascar for more than 50 million years, they provide an opportunity to identify fundamental mechanisms and patterns in primate social evolution through comparison with other primates. Lemurs evolved all basic types of primate social systems, but details of their social structure, as well as behavioral and morphological correlates of polygynous mating systems, deviate from those of the better-known anthropoids and prosimians. Most of these apparently non-convergent traits are subject to intrasexual selection and therefore raise questions about lemur life histories and mechanisms of male reproductive competition. I studied the social and mating systems of several solitary and group-living polygynous lemurs in Kirindy forest, Western Madagascar, to provide a basis for preliminary answers to these questions. Specifically, several hundred individually marked individuals were regularly re-captured and observed over several years to characterize their social system. Furthermore, genetic analyses of variation in mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite markers permitted illumination of population genetic structure and variation in individual reproductive success. For Mirza coguereli, these data revealed that solitary individuals are organized into extended matrilines and that their mating system is best characterized as scramble competition polygyny. In Propithecus verreauxi, small social groups are characterized by female philopatry and even sex ratios. Male reproductive success in this species is highly skewed towards the dominant resident male. These preliminary data therefore helped to identify similarities with other primates in fundamental life history traits, confirmed predictions about the mating system in the solitary species, but they provided no answer for the lack of convergence in several sexually selected traits of the group-living species. This indirectly supports the hypothesis that diurnal group-living lemurs are in a state of evolutionary disequilibrium. Deconstructing Monogamy: Thailands Gibbons at Khao YaiVolker Sommer1 and Ulrich Reichard2 The traditional view of gibbon social organization emphasises that (a) they live in nuclear families of 2-6 members, (b) the breeding pair maintains a lifelong, sexually monogamous relationship, (c) they are quintessentially territorial. This view is challenged, both on theoretical grounds and with data from a long-term study on white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) in Thailands Khao Yai rainforest. Here, group ranges overlap considerably and encounters are not only agonistic but contain various affinitive behavioural pattern such as play. The term territory does not seem to reflect this situation properly. Similarly, monogamy is often employed without clear reference to the levels of grouping, mating or breeding although these dimensions do not necessarily correspond. The concept of a rigid grouping monogamy in gibbons is increasingly challenged by reports of partner changes (serial monogamy; at Khao Yai, not a single group with known history maintained lifelong grouping monogamy), and non-monogamous groupings (polyandry, polygyny or polygynandry in about one fifth of all groups). There is also increasing evidence for extra-pair copulations which may reflect a female strategy to confuse paternity and forestall infanticide. Thus, gibbon social organization is much more flexible than previously thought. Managing Conflict in Group-Living PrimatesFilippo Aureli Conflict between group members is a natural outcome of competition for resources and co-ordination of activities. The escalation of conflict, however, can have detrimental consequences for the individuals involved and jeopardise co-operation that relies on their relationships. It follows that mechanisms of conflict management should be a critical component of the social life in any group-living species. During the last two decades a growing research effort has focused on the study of these mechanisms in non-human primates. The behaviour that has been most intensively studied is reconciliation, i.e. a friendly reunion between former opponents soon after an aggressive conflict. There is strong evidence for post-conflict reunions in the vast majority of the species studied both in captivity and in the wild. Researchers also demonstrated that these reunions function in repairing social relationships and found great variation in their frequencies across dyads of the same group, across groups of the same species, and across closely related species. These findings suggest that conflict resolution occurs more often in more valuable relationships. The involvement of third parties during and after an aggressive conflict has been widely reported, but the study of the conflict management function of triadic interactions is still at an early stage. Reducing the probability of escalation is certainly a more efficient way to manage conflict than repairing the damage afterwards. Mechanisms that aim to prevent the occurrence of an event (e.g. aggressive escalation) are, however, more difficult to study than the ones following an event (e.g. reconciliation). Thus, much less is known about the mechanisms to control aggression. A context in which these mechanisms have been extensively studied is crowding. Primates successfully cope with crowded conditions, and different mechanisms are used depending on the species and the duration of the condition. Learning what to eat: The role of social influences in capuchins.E. Visalberghi and E. Addessi Though feeding is crucial for survival we know little about how nonhuman
primates learn what to feed upon and how they tune up their diet. According
to Lee (1994) living in social groups affords the opportunity of exchanging
information among individuals; consequently, living in groups, as most
primate species do, can be of great advantage in learning when, how, and
what to feed upon (e.g. Giraldeau, 1997). We investigated whether captive
capuchin monkeys learn to assess food palatability from watching what
conspecifics eat. Our previous experiments on capuchin monkeys demonstrated
that they eat significantly more novel food when in the presence of group
members provided with the same novel food. Group members potentially provide
different sources of social influences; therefore, consumption could have
been affected by the mere presence of group members (reducing an individuals
stress of being alone, or its neophobic response), by the fact that group
members were eating (i.e. social facilitation of eating), or by which
food they were eating (stimulus enhancement). We experimentally investigated
the role of the above factors by assessing individuals consumption
of novel foods when the experimental subject was (1) alone with nobody
in the nearby cage (Alone condition, A); (2) with group members present
in the nearby cage with no food (Presence condition, P); (3) with group
members present and eating a familiar food whose colour is different from
that of the novel food (Presence plus different-Food condition, PdF);
and (4) with group members present and eating a familiar food whose colour
is the same as the colour of the novel food (Presence plus same-Food condition,
PsF). The subject was separated from group members by a Plexiglas panel
which allows them to see each other. Results showed that frequency of
eating behaviour and grams of food ingested were significantly higher
in the PsF and the PdF conditions than in the A and in the P conditions.
Moreover, the frequency of eating was significantly higher in the PsF
condition than in the PdF condition, although the amount of food ingested
was not. The increased consumption recorded in the PdF condition indicate
that eating behaviour is socially facilitated regardless of the visual
appearance of the food eaten by group members. The results obtained in
the PsF condition suggest that stimulus enhancement does not affect the
amount of food ingested, although it slows down eating behaviour. Giraldeau, L.A. (1997) The ecology of information use. In J. Krebs and N. Davies (eds) Behavioral Ecology, 4th edition, Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp.42-68. Lee, P.C. (1994) Social structure and evolution. In P.J.B. Slater and T.R. Halliday (eds) Behaviour and Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.266-302. The colobus of the Taï Forest: three ways of making a livingRonald Noë Three species of Colobus-monkeys share the same environment, the tropical moist forest of the Taï National Park of Ivory Coast: the western red colobus ((Pro)Colobus badius); the olive colobus ((Pro)Colobus verus) and the western black & white or king colobus (Colobus polykomos). These species have many common characteristics, the most significant of which is perhaps a multi-chambered stomach which makes it possible to digest leaves. In spite of a common ancestor and environment the three species show striking differences in body size, group size, mating system, dispersal pattern, anti-predation defence strategies and a number of other characteristics. The accepted way of explaining such differences is to start from differences in diet. Diet is assumed to be the ultimate cause of a cascade of further cause and effect relationships. For example: differences in food distribution lead to different levels of competitive aggression, causing differences in payoffs from coalition formation, which in turn select for different forms of dispersal behaviour, which leads to differences in kinship structure etc. Many hypotheses based on this scenario have been tested and the general line of reasoning found considerable support. However, a key question has generally been ignored: Why do such sympatric and congeneric species have different diets? Is this a matter of niche differentiation due to inter-specific competition? Or do causal arrows run back from characteristics such as group size or anti-predation defence? I will argue that the complex of different characteristics of a species hang together by a network of causal relationships forming an adaptive syndrome at which each of the three species arrived from a common starting point along a spiral-like pathway that included several feedback loops. Diet can cause group size as much as the other way around. It therefore makes more sense to explain why some syndromes are more likely than other than engaging in circular arguments about the starting points of feedback loops. Primates, People and Development: Conservation Challenges in GabonCaroline E.G. Tutin Gabon, a country slightly larger than Great Britain with a population of 1.2 million, straddles the equator on the coast of West Africa. About 80% of the country is covered by tropical forest, and three-quarters of the population live in towns or cities. Nineteen species of diurnal primate occur, including the endemic Cercopithecus solatus and significant populations of Colobus satanas, Mandrillus sphinx, Pan t. troglodytes and Gorilla g. gorilla. Hunting to supply commercial urban markets is the greatest threat to primates. As yet, there are no National Parks in Gabon, but four large Faunal Reserves cover about 10% of the countrys area. Compared to neighbouring countries, per capita income in Gabon is high as exploitation and exportation of mineral resources provided substantial wealth during the past 30 years. However, oil and uranium reserves are now dwindling and the extraction of timber will be the mainstay of future economic development. Logging is highly selective and considerable efforts are being made to introduce reduced impact logging techniques such that timber is harvested in a sustainable manner. The link between logging and the bushmeat trade is clear, as access and transport are the major factors that encourage commercial hunting. Present levels of hunting are clearly unsustainable but current management of timber forests does not include control or monitoring of hunting. The potential remains in Gabon to apply a landscape approach to conservation and development, but changes in attitudes, legislation combined with an engagement of grass root support are essential. Is it possible to achieve such changes, or is a slide towards a fragmented landscape where Protected Areas are the only places where primates remain, inevitable? Advances in Studies Linking Social Behaviour with Genetic Structure in Non-human PrimatesM.W. Bruford1 and M.K. Bayes2 In the last five years, previously unimaginable detail has started to emerge from studies of wild primate populations, on the complex interactions involving social behaviour, mating patterns and genetic structure. Non-human primates exhibit a wide variety of social systems, the complexities of which have been studied in detail as part of some of the great longitudinal ecological studies of animal populations of the last forty years. Although most primates are social, contrasting patterns of mating behaviour, dominance, dispersal, group size and many other factors are found in different species, and even within the same species. These factors have made non-human primate studies both a major focus in evolutionary ecology and a potentially rich source of comparative data. Until recently, however, detailed studies of primate demographic patterns and their genetic impact have been confounded by inherent problems in measuring reproductive success, inclusive fitness, relatedness and genetic differentiation among social groups and populations. Primates have long been regarded as very difficult subjects for such studies due to the problems, both ethical and logistic, of taking samples invasively for genetic studies, and because of the perceived consequences of such actions on the behaviour of the study populations. The advent of non-invasive genotyping techniques in the last few years has changed this impasse. Through amplification of DNA from hair and faeces and with the availability, through the human genome mapping project, of vast numbers of polymorphic microsatellite systems for primates, significant advances have at last been seen in this field. In this talk I will outline some recent examples, from the work of ourselves and others, of how such studies are changing some of the paradigms within primate evolutionary ecology, and how the elucidation of increasingly fine-scale patterns of genetic structure within primate communities may enable us to solve some of the puzzling complex social structures which seem commonplace in apes and monkeys. Jan van Hooff (Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands) and Susie Utami Atmoko (Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia). Their title is: Two of a kind: Alternative sexual strategies of adult male orangutans. Abstract not available. Please note that a proposed talk by Annie Gautier-Hion will be replaced by that of Anthony Rylands. Primate Conservation Global Patterns, Hotspots and Wilderness areasAnthony B. Rylands and William R. Konstant A recent taxonomic evaluation of the diversity of non-human primates
has indicated at least 601 distinct taxa, classified into 66 genera in
15 families, and approximately 293 species. Of these, 51 (8.5%) occur
in Madagascar, 163 (27%) are African, 183 (30.5%) are Asian, and 204 (34%)
occur in the Neotropics. Primates occur in 92 of the worlds 213
sovereign countries, but just four (Brazil, Democratic Republic of Congo,
Indonesia and Madagascar) account for two-thirds of them. According to
the 2000 Red List of Threatened Animals of the IUCN Species Survival Commission,
137 primates (23%) are currently Critically Endangered or
Endangered. Prioritization is necessary in that the number
of species threatened with extinction far outstrips the resources available
for their conservation. The IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group, in collaboration
with Conservation International, Washington, DC, is currently drawing
up a major action plan for the Critically Endangered and Endangered primates.
The analysis of global patterns of threats to primates in this action
plan uses the biogeographic constructs of hotspots (extremely
threatened areas of exceptionally high biodiversity and numbers of endemic
species), and two tropical forest wilderness areas (species-rich
areas which although highly threatened, are still largely intact
the Amazon and the Congolean Forests) (N. Myers et al., Nature, Lond.
403: 853-58, 2000). Primates occur in 15 of the 25 hotspots, and 147 (50%)
of the species are endemic to one or more of them: of these, 112 are Critically
Endangered or Endangered. The Amazon wilderness area
takes in a further 59 endemic species and the Congolean forests a further
nine. The major threats, and strategies for the conservation of the habitats
for the primates in the wilderness areas and hotspots, will be discussed. EFP 2000 - WORKSHOPSMonday 27 November, 2000 ABSTRACTSPrior to the invited speakers conference at the ZSL, workshops will be held at Goldsmiths College and the University of Surrey, Roehampton.1. Genetics and Evolution Jan de Ruiter (University of Durham, UK) & Nick Mundy (University of Oxford, UK) The combination of modern molecular genetics and new analytical methods herald an exciting time for primatology, from the level of intragroup relationships up to macroevolutionary patterns. In this workshop we will concentrate on some recent innovations in this field. Areas for discussion will include relatedness, population genetics and adaptive molecular evolution. As well as welcoming those with a general interest in the field, the workshop will provide an opportunity for people with their own datasets to bring them along. 2. Simian Viruses Myra McClure (Imperial College Schhool of Medicine,
London, UK) and David Brown (Public Health Laboratory Service, Colindale,
London, UK) 3. Use of Primates in Research Bertrand Deputte (Université
de Rennes, France) and Mark Matfield (Research Defence Society, London,
UK) 4. Cognition & Social Complexity Felippo Aureli (John Moores
University, UK) and Robin Dunbar (University of Liverpool, UK) 5. Ecology and Sociality Phyllis Lee (University of Cambridge,
UK) and Volker Sommer (University College London, London, UK) 6. Behavioural and Physiological Development Debbie Curtis1, Ann
MacLarnon1, Christopher Pryce2 & Jo Setchel1 ABSTRACTS FOR POSTER PRESENTATIONSLocal sexual competition rather than sperm competition in a nocturnal prosimian? Evidence from genetic determination of paternity in captive grey mouse lemursMarjorie Andrès1, Hélène Gachot-Neveu2, Martine
Perret1 Among nocturnal Malagasy prosimians, the grey mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus) is considered a solitary species having a promiscuous mating system. Indirect evidence such as the lack of sexual dimorphism, the high relative testes size of males and the high synchronism in estrus occurrence among females support the presence of sperm competition. In captive animals, we used genetic determination of paternity to define the relationship between social rank and reproductive success of males kept in groups with several females during the mating period. Within each group, intense sexual competition arose among males for priority of access to estrus females. High ranking males, determined from the direction of agonistic interactions, have significantly higher mating success than subordinated males. A high ranking position is associated with a higher frequency of marking behaviours and of chemosensory investigations of females. Moreover, the rank difference in aggressive behaviours of females in response to male sexual solicitations suggests that females could exert a choice. A robust relationship was found between male rank and reproductive success since 33 out of the 35 offspring produced have been sired by the highest ranked male of each group. Local sexual competition rather than sperm competition seems to be prevalent in mating system of the grey mouse lemur. In this nocturnal arboreal species, olfactory signals, rather than size or morphological traits might be favored by sexual selection and might be used for both sexual coordination between sexes and partner choice. The Darwin initiative in the Gabon: molecular ecology and conservation of western lowland gorillasNicola Anthony1, Mireille Johnson-Bawe2, Kathryn Jeffreys1, Jean Wickings2,
Kate Abernethy2, Lee White3 and Michael Bruford1 The principle research objective of this three year collaborative effort is to examine patterns of genetic variability in western lowland gorillas at different geographic scales. Gabon harbors some of the largest population densities of the western lowland gorilla, yet little is known of the genetic structure of natural populations. Building on a recently completed pan-African study of gorilla genetic variation, we are currently in the process of sampling gorilla hair and faecal material from a network of candidate protected areas throughout Gabon. Protocols for the successful amplification of mitochondrial and microsatellite genetic markers from shed hair and faeces have been established. In addition to basic research, there are several other activities that form an equally important part of this program. In the past year, the Darwin initiative has been responsible for (1) within country technical training (2) transfer of appropriate molecular technologies and (3) development of an introductory course in conservation biology at the National Science University in Franceville, Gabon. Non-invasive monitoring of reproductive status in wild mongoose lemurs (Eulemur mongoz): an investigation of faecal steroid excretion patternsD. J. Curtis1, A. Zaramody2, D. I. Green1, A. R. Pickard1 The non-invasive monitoring of reproductive events in females is vital to the conservation, captive management and breeding of endangered species. This study focused on Eulemur mongoz in one of the first attempts at monitoring reproductive parameters in faeces collected from wild lemurs (n=4). The aims were: (1) To establish which oestrogen and progestagen metabolites occur in the faeces using Gas Chromatography - Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). (2) To monitor ovarian function and pregnancy by measuring faecal steroids using a total oestrogen and a 20a-dihydroprogesterone enzymeimmunoassay (EIA). Oestrogen concentrations were too low to be detected by GC-MS, while progestagens were present in detectable quantitites (breeding season: 5,16-pregnen-3b-ol-20-one; pregnancy: 5b-pregnan-3b-ol-20-one). Characterization of the hormone cycle was not possible, due the occurrence of pseudooestrus prior to first oestrus and conception at first ovulation. Detection of ovulation was possible if the sampling frequency was high enough and the ratio oestrogens / progestagens was determined. The first 91 and 111 days of pregnancy were monitored in two adults. Pregnancy in a subadult was terminated after 70-80 days. Pregnancy was reliably determined 40-50 days after conception, when progestagen and oestrogen excretion increased above breeding season concentrations. Ecology, social structure, and inter-sexual differences in free-ranging mantled howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) on Ometepe island (Nicaragua)C. Devos1, M.-C. Huynen1 and P.A. Garber2 From February through May 1999, we conducted a field study of the behaviour and ecology of a group of mantled howler monkeys at the Ometepe Biological Research Station, Nicaragua. The focus of this research was to examine evidence of intersexual differences in behaviour, and the degree to which female reproductive state influenced male and female social interactions. A total of 350h of data were collected on the activity budget, diet, and social interactions of adult group members using a 2 min instantaneous and a 90 min focal animal sampling technique. Sex-based differences in behaviour were examined using a chi2 test. The results indicate that males rested significantly more, fed less, and consumed more leaves and fewer flowers than did females. Males also spent more time than females in affiliative and sexual interactions, principally with other males and with females without offspring. Females without offspring were the preferred interactants for other females, but none of these differences were statistically significant. Variation in subgroup size and composition throughout the study strongly suggests that these howlers maintain flexible patterns of social spacing and troop cohesion, probably related to food distribution and fragmentation of the habitat. The adaptation of reintroduced chimpanzees to continuous forest in the Conkouati Reserve, Republic of CongoK.H. Farmer1, A. Jamart2 and H.M Buchanan-Smith1 Since 1996 the non-governmental organisation, Habitat Ecologique et Liberté des Primates has reintroduced 22 chimpanzees (6 males and 16 females) back to the wild. Sixteen of these have survived, four have disappeared (status unknown) and two are known to have died. The five chimpanzees that were released in 1996 are all in good health and have been nutritionally self-sufficient since day one post-release. Activity budgets are comparable to those in wild populations and the reintroducees eat a similar range of leaves, stems, fruits and insects. Here we focus on one skill necessary for the successful adaptation of the reintroduced chimpanzees: nest building. The fabrication of nests is a feature of wild chimpanzee behaviour and may be a critical variable on the health and survivorship of chimpanzees in offering protection from predators and the elements. Like their wild con-specifics, the released chimpanzees built their nests in groups, high in trees. Such differences as were found could largely be attributed to environmental factors and the semi-restrictive pre-release environment. However, the pre-release island environment provided the chimpanzees the opportunity to develop and practise nest-building skills. As a consequence they were able to build fully functional nests immediately post-release. The ability to follow eye gaze and its emergence during development in macaque monkeysP.F. Ferrari, E. Kohler, L. Fogassi and W. Gallese The ability of monkeys to follow the gaze of other individuals is a matter of debate in many behavioral studies. There is little evidence at the behavioral level of the presence and development of such abilities in monkeys. The aim of the present study was to assess in juveniles and adult pig-tailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina) the capacity to use eye cues alone to follow the gaze of an experimenter. Biological stimuli (head, eye and trunk movements) were presented by an experimenter to 11 captive monkeys of different age. A non-biological stimulus served as a control. Results showed that macaques can follow the gaze of the experimenter using head/eyes or eye cues alone. Trunk movements and non-biological stimuli did not significantly elicit similar reactions. Juvenile monkeys were not able to orient their attention on the basis of eye cues alone. In general, gaze following was more frequent in adults than in juveniles. However, similarly to humans, such abilities in macaques dramatically improve with age suggesting that the transition to adulthood is a crucial period in the development of gaze following behavior. Vocal repertoires and classification of vocalisations in 5 Eulemur speciesMarco Gamba and Cristina Giacoma Results of a comparative acoustic analysis of vocalisations in 5 Eulemur species (Eulemur rubriventer, Eulemur macaco (E. m. macaco and E. m. flavifrons), Eulemur coronatus, Eulemur mongoz, Eulemur fulvus (E. f. albifrons and E. f. mayottensis) are discussed in this work. Digital audio and video recording of the naturally occurring vocalisations of 17 captive groups of lemurs were collected at: Parco Natura Viva-Garda Zoological Park (Bussolengo-VR, Italy), Mulhouse Zoo (Mulhouse, France), Koln Zoo (Koln, Germany), Apenheul (Apeldoorn, The Netherlands). A detailed acoustical analysis was performed in order to classify emitted vocalisations using seven acoustic parameters (dominant frequency, four spectrum peaks, index of formant dispersion, duration) to generate data to compare species and subspecies emissions. Processing of seven acoustic parameters (dominant frequency, four spectrum peaks, index of formant dispersion, duration) for Grunt vocalisations, present in the repertoire of all the species, has shown that it is possible to elaborate a tentative phylogeny of lemurs based on the acoustic structure of their vocalisations. Multivariate PCA and Discriminant analyses were reliable for categorising 'long grunts' and 'grunts' in most species. Most of the non-tonal emissions of the study species could be categorised. Using a larger set of acoustic parameters we have been able to discriminate between modulated and stable tonal emissions. This work was supported by Parco Natura Viva Garda Zoological Park. Cheek pouch use and Concurrent Behaviour: Implications for Activity Budgets ModelsV. Gutierrez-Diego The ability of all cercopithecines to consume food while engaged in other activities is an adaptation that has been greatly overlooked and its importance to time budget models has been disregarded. This study was conducted on a troop of yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalus) in Mikumi National Park, Tanzania as part of a comprehensive research project on cheek pouches. Preliminary analyses reveal more than a 32% increase of the feeding time budget category when cheek pouch use is included. Cheek pouch chewing is conducted simultaneously with other behaviours 12% of the time. Conventional time budget studies have considered pouch emptying as a resting behaviour, and as a consequence resting time budgets have been overestimated. A new behaviour in Garnett's greater bushbabies (Otolemur garnettii): Foot-rubbing as a multifunctional form of communicationReinmar Hager Garnett's greater bushbabies exhibit a curious behaviour that has, to my knowledge, not yet been reported and analysed. By rubbing a part of their foot on wood or on other substrates they produce a scraping noise which probably serves as a multifunctional form of intra-specific communication. The particular area on the feet is characterised by much tougher skin which can grow to extensive horn-like structures. Both males and females have this region of tough skin on their feet which is free of glands. In this study I observed and recorded the behaviour of captive Garnett's greater bushbabies. Males exhibited foot-rubbing significantly more often than females both when housed individually and in pairs. In general, the level of foot-rubbing was lower when the animals were housed as individuals. This behaviour occurred in the context of different situations. Females usually exhibited foot-rubbing after they were approached by males and after agonistic interactions. Males also exhibited this behaviour in agonistic interactions as well as when following females and in response to another male foot-rubbing. These observations suggest that this behaviour has multiple functions in communication but apparently does not serve a marking function. Foot-rubbing produces a noise that may be indistinguishable from background noise to other animals. The bushbabies may indicate their presence to conspecifics or potential mating partners without revealing their presence to predators. The fact that foot-rubbing is exhibited by both sexes in agonistic interactions may indicate a further aspect of this behaviour. The closely related species Galago crassicaudatus does not have this characteristic region on their feet and I have not observed a similar behaviour in previous studies of other species. Causes and Consequences of Troop Fusion in the Mikumi Yellow Baboons (Papio cynocephalus)D.M. Hawkins1,2, G.W. Norton1,2 and P. Cunneyworth2,3 Halfway through a two year study of the time budgets of yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalus) in Mikumi National Park the two main study groups fused. This provided a fortuitous opportunity to investigate the immediate consequences of a sudden doubling of group size on individual behaviour. From these results, and other observations made at the time of the fusion, it is possible to suggest factors promoting this fusion event in Mikumi National Park. As a consequence of the troop fusion, individuals gained foraging benefits without incurring costs of increased intragroup competition and were relieved of serious time budget constraints. Decrease in intertroop competition appears to have been an important factor in these benefits. Anti-predator benefits may have played a role in facilitating both the fusion event and the subsequent exploration of new areas by the resultant single larger troop. Undoubtedly, a variety of ecological factors created a situation in which individuals could gain these net benefits by fusing with another troop. This coincided with the occurrence of demographic conditions which made fusion possible. Mother-infant relationships in development: a growth-modelling approach
to the study of change
|
|||||||
| Site maintained by: Mandy Korstjens: webmaster@psgb.org
to send any comments or questions. The contents of this site are Copyright © 1997-2006 by their respective authors. They are not for citation or quotation without the express permission of the authors. |
|||||||